Hello, Guest!
  • Friday, November 22, 2024

ArchTIS Signs Federal Channel Partners for Data Security Offering; Kurt Mueffelmann Quoted

ArchTIS and its U.S. subsidiary, Nucleus Cyber, have signed on four channel partners to offer information security technology to government contractors that want to pursue the Department of Defense’s Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification program.

Canberra, Australia-based archTIS said Wednesday its newly formed U.S. federal and defense sales and channel practice partnered with Carahsoft Technology, Hawk Associates, IMPRES Technology and TechSolnz in a push to help defense industrial base suppliers meet CMMC requirements.

“With the migration to the Cloud, BYOD, and Covid-19 creating a worldwide remote workforce, there truly is no perimeter anymore,” said Kurt Mueffelmann, global chief operating officer and U.S. president at archTIS.

Mueffelmann added that the company seeks to help contractors comply with DOD’s cybersecurity standards with the use of attribute-based access control platforms.

ArchTIS’ ABAC technology offers a “fine-grained security” approach meant to support risk reduction and zero trust implementation programs.

The Australian security software provider said its portfolio includes the Kojensi and NC Protect platforms designed to secure sharing of sensitive and classified information.

Video of the Day

Related Articles

GovCon Expert Payam Pourkhomami: The CMMC 2.0 Accreditation Ecosystem Explained Cybersecurity

GovCon Expert Payam Pourkhomami: The CMMC 2.0 Accreditation Ecosystem Explained

By Payam Pourkhomami, President & CEO of OSIbeyond Those familiar with the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification, especially its updated 2.0 version, know that its most significant shift from earlier Department of Defense cybersecurity efforts lies in the introduction of a tiered certification process. Unlike past standards, such as NIST SP 800-171, CMMC 2.0 mandates both

GovCon Expert Payam Pourkhomami Explains the Difference Between NIST SP 800-171 and CMMC 2.0—Part 2 Cybersecurity

GovCon Expert Payam Pourkhomami Explains the Difference Between NIST SP 800-171 and CMMC 2.0—Part 2

By Payam Pourkhomami, President & CEO of OSIbeyond Read part one here What is the difference between NIST SP 800-171 and CMMC? Aspect NIST SP 800-171 CMMC 2.0 Certification process Self-assessment only Self-assessments combined with mandatory third-party certification for most Level 2 contractors and all Level 3 contractors Requirements Narrowly focused on controlled unclassified information

Quzara’s Saif Rahman: DIB Organizations Should Put Emphasis on Security Visibility, Maintain SOC Capability Cybersecurity

Quzara’s Saif Rahman: DIB Organizations Should Put Emphasis on Security Visibility, Maintain SOC Capability

Saif Rahman, CEO and co-founder of Quzara, said defense industrial base organizations looking to comply with the Department of Defense’s Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification framework should focus on having security visibility through auditing, monitoring and generating security logs to better understand the vulnerabilities they face. In an article published on Carahsoft.com, Rahman discussed the need